Pauloz
Expert
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 1160
Career Advice: +3/-0
Location: Sydney
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 6:26 am Post subject: Re: Regardless |
 |
|
| b2decent wrote: | | The company seems to be dragging their feet. A deadline is set for people to oblige by, its not for someone to play by their own rules. In the event that I would have appealed 21 days late do u think that I would have the same justice? I think that I know the officiating person and I think that he has a grudge against me. I think I put him in his place last time i had UC |
As I understand it, "due process" isn't a selective process. Maybe this guy needs to put a band aid on his ego, but that applies to statutory processes, too, as far as I'm aware, even despite the possible effects on the fragile psyches of bureaucrats. Regs are regs, and UC should know that better than anyone.
Unless there's some other obscure regulatory provision about times to lodge, they're obviously out of line. Impressive to see them machine gunning themselves in the foot, but to take advantage of this situation, still suggest a chat with a lawyer. |
|
Register
Log in
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
